What happens when a developer truly understands motion?

We stop reading resumes and start reading code. The Cuiko methodology is a forensic audit of how a developer thinks, writes, and ships. It’s not about years of experience; it’s about the quality of decisions per line of code.

The 4-Stage Filter

Transparency is the baseline. This is the exact funnel every candidate walks through. Most fail at Stage 2.

01

Logic Audit

We review 500+ lines of their open-source contributions (or test projects). We ignore syntax; we look for architectural choices. Do they over-engineer? Do they handle edge cases? Is the code defensive or optimistic?

Code structure
02

The Latency Test

A blind coding challenge focused solely on performance. We measure render time, memory allocation, and battery impact. If the solution is elegant but slow, it is rejected immediately.

Server latency
03

Gesture Native

A UI task that requires precise touch handling. We check for intuitive haptics, smooth 60fps transitions, and adherence to iOS/Android human interface guidelines without looking at documentation.

Mobile UI
04

System Interview

Not a Q&A. A whiteboard session on "How would you architect this?" We look for trade-off awareness and the ability to articulate "why" over "how."

Whiteboard session

Common Failure Modes

Why 90% of applicants are rejected within the first hour.

The "It Works" Trap

Code that functions but creates 200ms of input lag is dead on arrival. Fix: We profile frame rates before logic verification.

Over-Abstraction

Junior devs write architecture; seniors write code. Fix: We enforce "No Generic Utils" until the third iteration.

State Blindness

Ignoring race conditions in async calls. Fix: We simulate network failure during the Latency Test.

The Cuiko Trade-offs

Speed vs. Complexity

We reject "fast" solutions that require 3rd party libraries for basic tasks. Mitigation: We mandate native APIs where performance is critical.

Polish vs. Scope

Pixel-perfect animations often reduce feature set. Mitigation: We treat animations as code, not decoration, planning them in the spec phase.

Autonomy vs. Alignment

Solo devs move fast but break architectural consistency. Mitigation: We enforce a strict PR review protocol even for single-contributor projects.

Trend vs. Stability

Chasing the newest framework often leads to tech debt. Mitigation: We vouch for stability; we rarely onboard devs using experimental tech.

The Match Protocol

Once a developer clears the filter, they enter the roster. When a client commissions a build, we don't just "send CVs." We run a compatibility matrix based on project velocity, tech stack preference, and past architectural scale.

  • Brief analysis within 24 hours.
  • Matched with 1–3 developers max. Quality over quantity.
  • Direct introduction. No middlemen.
Start a Brief
Compatibility Matrix

The Cuiko Lexicon

Latency Budget
The strict millisecond allowance for every touch interaction. If a screen takes >100ms to respond to a tap, it fails.
Gesture Native
A developer who builds UI controls that feel native to the device immediately, without referencing iOS/Android docs.
State & Micro-interactions
The definition of the data flow and the 0.2s animations that confirm user intent. We look for developers who code these simultaneously.
42ms
Avg Render Time
110+
Developers Vouched
0
Recruiters Involved

Ready to build with intent?

Whether you need to commission a high-velocity build or join the roster of elite engineers, the process starts here.